In my experimental simulation graph, the central position cannot be as large as in the experimental data graph. I suspect this may be due to transmission. Is it possible to make adjustments in the software to address this issue? Or do you have any other suggestions to make it closer to reality? Thank you.
Designs
Child items ...
Show closed items
Linked items 0
Link issues together to show that they're related.
Learn more.
In my experience, the shape of the reflected beam is determined partly by the original intensity profile and partly by the beam divergence curve. Estimation of contribution weights requires knowledge of the experimental conditions.
For the time being it would be better to exclude near-specular area from fitting by applying masks
Currently BornAgain addresses the intensity of specular peak according to polar and azimuthal beam divergence. The beam itself is "thin" before the divergence, there is no internal intensity profile. That is why the good match of measured and simulated data is unlikely to expect. For that reason the area selected black is not of high importance for the analysis with BornAgain.
To my knowledge, such galo is presumably related to diffuse scattering from sample or its environment. So it shouldn't be neglected by default unless you want to focus on other features of scattering pattern.
Dear Wei, I hope Mikhail's explanations were somehow helpful for you. I will now close this issue. For further questions and suggestions you are always welcome to open a new issue or write to contact@bornagainproject.org.