Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 71bc9437 authored by Wuttke, Joachim's avatar Wuttke, Joachim
Browse files

uniform notation of cross section with d, not \partial.

parent 609434b7
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -277,14 +277,14 @@ Altogether,
the expected count rate in detector pixel $(i,j)$ is proportional to
\begin{equation}\label{EItrafo_cos}
I_{ij} = \cos^3\!\alpha_\sf\, \cos^3\!\phi_\sf\:
\frac{\partial\sigma}{\partial\Omega}(\q_{ij}),
\frac{\d\sigma}{\d\Omega}(\q_{ij}),
\end{equation}
where we have omitted constant factors $L^{-2}$, $\Delta y$ and $\Delta z$.
Using pixel coordinates instead of angles, this can be rewritten as
\Emph{%
\begin{equation}\label{EItrafo_pix}
I_{ij} = \left( 1+\frac{y^2+z^2}{L^2}\right)^{-3/2}
\frac{\partial\sigma}{\partial\Omega}\bigl(\q_{ij}(y,z)\bigr).
\frac{\d\sigma}{\d\Omega}\bigl(\q_{ij}(y,z)\bigr).
\end{equation}
\vspace*{-2pt}}
%(usually as the centre between the transmitted
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment